z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An Exploration of the Experiences and Educational Needs of Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome Receiving Spinal Cord Stimulation
Author(s) -
Ryan Cormac G.,
Eldabe Sam,
Chadwick Raymond,
Jones Susan E.,
ElliottButton Helene L.,
Brookes Morag,
Martin Denis J.
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
neuromodulation: technology at the neural interface
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.296
H-Index - 60
eISSN - 1525-1403
pISSN - 1094-7159
DOI - 10.1111/ner.12885
Subject(s) - failed back surgery , spinal cord stimulation , bespoke , medicine , physical therapy , physical medicine and rehabilitation , spinal cord , psychiatry , political science , law
Objective To explore the experience of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) for patients with failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS). Methods Adults with FBSS referred for SCS underwent semistructured interviews at three time points: before their SCS trial, after the trial, and three months after receiving the SCS implant. The face‐to‐face interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim and analyzed thematically. Results Twelve adults (8 male, 4 female, aged 38–80 years, pain duration 1–26 years) were recruited. Six themes were identified; 1) What should I expect? 2) Varied outcomes, 3) Understanding pain and this new treatment, 4) Experiences of the SCS journey, 5) Getting used to the device, and 6) Finding out what I need to know. Participants' expectations were varied and the procedures were broadly viewed as minor surgery. Participants' expectations about SCS were not limited to pain relief and included reductions in medication, better sleep, and increased physical activity. Participants' understanding of pain and how SCS purports to work was limited. Throughout the process, practical challenges were identified such as the surgical wound management and battery recharging. Participants received information from multiple sources and identified a range of key information needs including a quick‐start guide on how to operate the device and a list of dos and don'ts. Conclusions Overall, participants' understanding of SCS was limited. The value participants placed on understanding of the process varied markedly. A list of practical informational needs has been identified. Bespoke, user‐friendly, informational tools should be developed from this list to enhance the patient experience of SCS. Keywords Failed back surgery syndrome, neuromodulation, patient experience, qualitative research, spinal cord stimulation

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom