z-logo
Premium
How (not) to underestimate unconscious perception
Author(s) -
Michel Matthias
Publication year - 2023
Publication title -
mind and language
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.905
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1468-0017
pISSN - 0268-1064
DOI - 10.1111/mila.12406
Subject(s) - unconscious mind , fallacy , consciousness , perception , psychology , personal unconscious , cognitive psychology , collective unconscious , epistemology , task (project management) , social psychology , psychoanalysis , philosophy , management , economics , neuroscience
Recent work questions whether previously reported unconscious perceptual effects are genuinely unconscious, or due to weak conscious perception. Some philosophers and psychologists react by rejecting unconscious perception or by holding that it has been overestimated. I argue that the most significant attack on unconscious perception commits the criterion content fallacy: the fallacy of interpreting evidence that observers were conscious of something as evidence that they were conscious of task‐relevant features. This fallacy is prevalent in consciousness research: if unconscious perception exists, scientists could routinely underestimate it. I conclude with methodological recommendations for moving the debate forward.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here