Open Access
Primary care physician perspectives on barriers and facilitators to self‐management of type 2 diabetes
Author(s) -
Khairnar Rahul,
Kamal Khalid M.,
Giannetti Vincent,
Dwibedi Nilanjana,
McConaha Jamie
Publication year - 2019
Publication title -
journal of pharmaceutical health services research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.244
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 1759-8893
pISSN - 1759-8885
DOI - 10.1111/jphs.12280
Subject(s) - medicine , polypharmacy , family medicine , type 2 diabetes , diabetes mellitus , primary care , medline , health literacy , self management , health care , intensive care medicine , machine learning , political science , economic growth , computer science , law , economics , endocrinology
Abstract Objectives To assess physician perspectives on perceived barriers and facilitators to type 2 diabetes self‐management (DSM) in a primary care setting. Methods The study utilized survey methodology to measure perspectives of primary care physicians on DSM and the challenges they face in managing patients with poor glycaemic stability. Demographic and practice site‐related information of the physicians were also collected. Key findings Of the 21 physicians who responded (53.8% response rate), 71.2% were aged 50 years or older, 54.2% had ≥25 years of clinical experience, and 50% practiced in an urban setting. The physicians examined 5–60 patients with type 2 diabetes per week (mean = 20), and over 75% of them spent <20 min on face‐to‐face visits. Approximately, 95% of physicians considered self‐care activities such as regular moderate exercise, following a recommended diet, regular blood glucose testing, proper insulin administration and adherence to oral medication as extremely important. Practice‐related aspects such as patient–physician communication, patient health literacy and patient follow‐up were unanimously considered extremely important, and performance on these measures was rated positively. Interestingly, 66% of physicians felt responsible to some extent for their patient's failure to reach type 2 DSM goals. Physician perceived barriers that contributed to clinical inertia included cost of medications, lack of patient motivation and knowledge, non‐compliance with diet and medications, polypharmacy and lack of time and social support. Conclusions The study results underscore the importance of DSM in the overall management of type 2 diabetes. Addressing the challenges faced by physicians may result in better self‐management and improved clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes population.