z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Pharmacist interventions in non‐prescription medicine use
Author(s) -
Galea Sephora,
Zarb Adami Maurice,
SerracinoInglott Anthony,
Azzopardi Lilian M
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of pharmaceutical health services research
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.244
H-Index - 15
eISSN - 1759-8893
pISSN - 1759-8885
DOI - 10.1111/jphs.12044
Subject(s) - medicine , medical prescription , psychological intervention , pharmacist , family medicine , pharmacy , nursing
Objectives The aim was to investigate the factors that influence non‐prescription medicines ( NPM s) recommendation by community pharmacists and to compare products available in different countries. Method A questionnaire was posted to all (217) managing community pharmacists in M alta and G ozo. Descriptive statistics were undertaken to obtain means ( M ) and frequencies (%), which were developed into cross‐tabulations. Eight international regulatory authorities were contacted to provide a list of NPM s, which was then compiled and analysed. Key findings A response rate of 91% was achieved. Demographics of community pharmacists participating were: mean age = 37 years (range 22–74 years), 69% female, 73% practiced in an independently owned pharmacy, 54% practiced > 10 years. Pharmacists were most likely to make non‐prescription recommendations for vitamins and nutritional supplements (99%), weight‐reducing aids (96%) and smoking cessation aids (91%). Pharmacists were asked to rate importance of possible influencing factors on a 5‐point Likert scale with 5 being the most important. Pharmacists were influenced by: ‘positive feedback from patients’ ( M  = 4.42) and ‘scientific evidence’ ( M  = 4.41). Non‐influential factors were ‘mark‐up of product’ ( M  = 2.75) and ‘product claims’ ( M  = 2.67). Pharmacists in the UK have a larger selection of NPM s for vitamins, dieting agents and smoking cessation than S witzerland, the USA and M alta. Conclusion The influential factors for the choice of the product were based on scientific evidence and the patient's previous experience.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here