z-logo
Premium
Stable coalition structures and power indices for majority voting
Author(s) -
Abe Takaaki
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
journal of public economic theory
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.809
H-Index - 32
eISSN - 1467-9779
pISSN - 1097-3923
DOI - 10.1111/jpet.12574
Subject(s) - axiom , core (optical fiber) , mathematical economics , voting , stability (learning theory) , power (physics) , power index , outcome (game theory) , set (abstract data type) , a priori and a posteriori , property (philosophy) , game theory , economics , mathematics , computer science , political science , law , machine learning , politics , telecommunications , philosophy , physics , geometry , epistemology , quantum mechanics , programming language
An (n,k)‐game is a voting game in which each player has exactly one vote, and decisions are made by at least k affirmative votes of the n players. A power index shows the a priori power of the n voters. The purpose of this paper is to show what axioms of power indices generate stable coalition structures for each (n,k)‐game. Using the stability notion of the core, we show that a coalition structure containing a minimal winning coalition is stable for a wide range of general power indices satisfying a set of axioms, such as the Shapley–Shubik, Banzhaf, normalized Banzhaf, and Deegan–Packel power indices. Moreover, we also show that a coalition structure that represents a two‐party system can be stable if the two large parties are close enough in size. Some unstable coalition structures are also analyzed.

This content is not available in your region!

Continue researching here.

Having issues? You can contact us here