
Impact of Contrast Agent Viscosity on Coronary Balloon Deflation Times: Bench Testing Results
Author(s) -
MOGABGAB OWEN,
PATEL VISHAL G.,
MICHAEL TESFALDET T.,
KOTSIA ANNA,
CHRISTOPOULOS GEORGE,
BANERJEE SUBHASH,
BRILAKIS EMMANOUIL S.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
journal of interventional cardiology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.764
H-Index - 51
eISSN - 1540-8183
pISSN - 0896-4327
DOI - 10.1111/joic.12097
Subject(s) - medicine , balloon , iodixanol , angioplasty , contrast (vision) , saline , cardiology , nuclear medicine , radiology , contrast medium , physics , optics
Objectives To assess the impact of viscosity on angioplasty balloon deflation times . Background Lower contrast viscosity could result in more rapid coronary balloon deflation times . Methods We performed a bench comparison of coronary balloon deflation times using 2 contrast agents with different viscosity (ioxaglate and iodixanol), 3 contrast dilutions, and 2 inflation syringe filling volumes. Ten identical pairs of coronary angioplasty balloons were used to conduct each comparison after balloon inflation to 12 atmospheres. Simultaneous deflations were performed under cineangiography. The time to full contrast extraction and the area of contrast remaining after 5 seconds of deflation (quantified by opaque pixel count) were compared between groups . Results The mean time to full contrast extraction during balloon deflation was 8.3 ± 2.5 seconds for ioxaglate (lower viscosity) versus 10.1 ± 2.9 seconds for iodixanol (higher viscosity) (17.4% decrease, P = 0.005), with a 35.6% (P = 0.004) reduction in contrast area at 5 seconds. Compared to 1:1 ioxaglate–saline mixture, 1:2 and 1:3 ioxaglate/saline mixes resulted in 26.7% (P < 0.001) and 39.0% (P < 0.001) reduction in mean balloon deflation time, respectively, but at the expense of decreased balloon opacity. Filling the inflation syringe with 5 versus 15 ml of contrast/saline solution was associated with 7.5% decrease in balloon deflation time (P = 0.005), but no difference in contrast area at 5 seconds (P = 0.749) . Conclusions Use of a lower viscosity contrast agent and higher contrast dilution significantly reduced coronary balloon deflation times, whereas use of lower syringe filling volume had a modest effect. Rapid coronary balloon deflation could improve the safety of interventional procedures . (J Interven Cardiol 2014;27:177–181)