z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Biopharmaceutics: Cytotoxicity of Absorption Enhancers in Caco‐2 Cell Monolayers
Author(s) -
SAKAI MICHINORI,
IMAI TERUKO,
OHTAKE HIROSHI,
OTAGIRI MASAKI
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
journal of pharmacy and pharmacology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.745
H-Index - 118
eISSN - 2042-7158
pISSN - 0022-3573
DOI - 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1998.tb03319.x
Subject(s) - trypan blue , chemistry , propidium iodide , cytotoxicity , sodium , neutral red , membrane , chromatography , paracellular transport , biochemistry , cell , in vitro , permeability (electromagnetism) , apoptosis , organic chemistry , programmed cell death
This study was performed to evaluate the utility of absorption enhancers with reference to mucosal cell cytotoxicity. Overall assessment of the damage to plasma, lysosomal and nuclear membranes by three absorption enhancers, sodium deoxycholate, sodium caprate and dipotassium glycyrrhizinate, was performed on Caco‐2 cell monolayers. The cytotoxicities of sodium deoxycholate (0.02–0.1% w/v), sodium caprate (0.1–0.5% w/v) and dipotassium glycyrrhizinate (0.5–2% w/v) were evaluated by the trypan blue‐exclusion test, the protein‐release test, the neutral‐red assay, the DNA‐propidium iodide staining test and the test for recovery of transepithelial electrical resistance (TEER) up to 24 h after treatment with each enhancer. Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS; 0.1% w/v), a potent surfactant, was used as positive control. SDS at this level was significantly cytotoxic whereas dipotassium glycyrrhizinate was not cytotoxic in any tests. Results from the trypan blue‐exclusion and protein‐release tests showed that high concentrations of sodium caprate (0.5% w/v) and sodium deoxycholate (0.1% w/v) were significantly cytotoxic to the plasma membrane. The neutral‐red assay, an indicator of damage to lysosomal membranes, revealed that 0.5% (w/v) sodium caprate had no effect whereas the uptake of neutral red was slightly increased by treatment with 0.1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate, implying that the compound had cell‐growth‐enhancing activity. Nuclear‐membrane damage, as evaluated by the DNA‐propidium iodide staining test, was severe in cell monolayers treated with 0.5% (w/v) sodium caprate compared with that induced by 0.1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate. In the TEER recovery test, TEER failed to recover 24 h after treatment with 0.5% (w/v) sodium caprate and 0.1% (w/v) SDS, but recovered after treatment with 0.1% (w/v) sodium deoxycholate. The recovery of TEER might be related to nuclear membrane damage and cell‐growth‐enhancing activity. These results indicate that of the three classes of enhancer, dipotassium glycyrrhizinate was not cytotoxic and that high concentrations of sodium caprate and sodium deoxycholate could damage plasma and nuclear membranes.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here