z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Major differences between glutamate‐fermenting species isolated from chemostat enrichments at different dilution rates
Author(s) -
Nanninga Henk J.,
Drent Wim J.,
Gottschal Jan C.
Publication year - 1986
Publication title -
fems microbiology letters
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.899
H-Index - 151
eISSN - 1574-6968
pISSN - 0378-1097
DOI - 10.1111/j.1574-6968.1986.tb01744.x
Subject(s) - chemostat , fermentation , dilution , ammonium , propionate , bacteria , carbon dioxide , strain (injury) , chemistry , biology , glutamate receptor , food science , microbiology and biotechnology , biochemistry , organic chemistry , genetics , physics , receptor , anatomy , thermodynamics
From chemostat enrichments conducted at dilution rates of 0.025, 0.12 and 0.25 h −1 glutamate‐ and aspartate‐fermenting bacteria were isolated. The dominant aspartate‐fermenting strains in all these enrichments belonged to the genus Campylobacter , whereas 3 dissimilar types of glutamate‐fermenting bacteria predominated at the different dilution rates. One of these strains was identified as Clostridium cochlearium . The remaining two were designated as strain DKglu16 (glutamate → acetate + propionate + ammonium + carbon dioxide) and DKglu21 (glutamate → acetate + formate + ammonium + carbon dioxide). Grown in continuous culture under glutamate limitation, strain DKglu16 (μ max = 0.13 h −1 ; K s = 1.9 μM) outcompeted C. cochlearium (μ max = 0.36 h −1 ; K s = 7 μM) at low dilution rates, but was outgrown at higher rates of dilution (0.044 h −1 ). In glutamate‐limited continuous culture the competitiveness of strain DKglu16 increased considerably when lactate was added to the feed in addition to glutamate.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here