z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Microbial community dynamics in nutrient‐pulsed chemostats
Author(s) -
CarreroColón Militza,
Nakatsu Cindy H.,
Konopka Allan
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
fems microbiology ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.377
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1574-6941
pISSN - 0168-6496
DOI - 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2006.00095.x
Subject(s) - biology , temperature gradient gel electrophoresis , microbial population biology , nutrient , chemostat , 16s ribosomal rna , community structure , bacteria , ribosomal rna , ecology , microbiology and biotechnology , genetics , gene
In nature, microbes are subject to nutrient fluxes. As the periodicity of nutrient flux lengthens, different physiological traits may be selected. The competitive exclusion principle stipulates that one organism will dominate these systems; however, interspecies interactions may produce a dynamic microbial community. These issues were investigated in chemostats pulsed with gelatin. Chemostats were run over 30 days with substrate addition continuously or at intervals of 0.5, 1 or 3 days. Growth rates were similar between pulse intervals. Ectoaminopeptidase activity levels remained relatively constant within a pulse interval. Bacterial community structure was monitored using denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of PCR products of the 16S rRNA gene. There were dynamic changes at all periodicities; however, the pace of these changes decreased over time. Final communities were not identical between different treatments. The structure of persistent vs. active microbial populations was compared by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis of the PCR and reverse transcriptase‐PCR amplicons of 16S rDNA and rRNA templates, respectively. For all the chemostats, the rRNA profiles were not identical to the rDNA profiles for a sample. These experiments demonstrate that complex community dynamics can occur under environmental heterogeneities that are modest relative to those found in natural aquatic habitats. Furthermore, the physiological functionality of these dynamic communities was stable.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here