z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Effect of mercury addition on plasmid incidence and gene mobilizing capacity in bulk soil
Author(s) -
Drønen Asbjørg Karine,
Torsvik Vigdis,
Goksøyr Jostein,
Top Eva Maria
Publication year - 1998
Publication title -
fems microbiology ecology
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.377
H-Index - 155
eISSN - 1574-6941
pISSN - 0168-6496
DOI - 10.1111/j.1574-6941.1998.tb00553.x
Subject(s) - plasmid , biology , mercury (programming language) , soil water , pseudomonas putida , escherichia coli , bacteria , ralstonia , microbiology and biotechnology , gene , t dna binary system , genetics , recombinant dna , vector (molecular biology) , ecology , computer science , programming language
Two methods of exogenous plasmid isolation were used to evaluate and compare the plasmid incidence and gene mobilizing capacity of eight soils before and after the addition of mercury. Biparental matings (BM) were performed using Pseudomonas putida UWC1 as recipient to obtain conjugative mercury resistance (Hg R ) plasmids. To obtain mobilizing plasmids, the transfer of the IncQ vector pMOL187 from Escherichia coli into Ralstonia eutropha was selected in triparental matings (TM). The numbers of donor, helper and recipient cells used in the matings were kept the same for each soil sample, which provided a way to compare plasmid incidence and gene mobilizing capacity on the basis of the numbers of transconjugants obtained. Using BM prior to mercury addition, plasmids that confer Hg R were obtained only from 1 of 8 soils. However, following the addition of mercury to these soils, Hg R transconjugants were obtained from 5 of the 8 soils, and among these broad (BHR) and narrow‐host‐range (NHR) plasmids were found at variable ratios. Similarly, these same five soils were the only ones to yield mobilizing plasmids by using TM; all of which were found to confer Hg R and to be BHR plasmids. This suggests that Hg R plasmids were the main cause of the increased mobilizing capacity observed in the mercury treated soils. Notably, there were three soils in which no plasmids that confer mercury resistance were obtained although the soils had at least 10 5 Hg R cfu g soil −1 , indicating that resistance to mercury may not be encoded on plasmids that could be transferred to the recipients used. Plasmids from 177 transconjugants obtained by BM and TM could be classified into 20 groups based on size and restriction fragment patterns, and none belonged to known classes of BHR plasmids. This indicates that there are diverse replicons capable of mediating the dissemination of mercury resistance.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here