z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
BRIEF REPORT: Housestaff Adherence to Cervical Cancer Screening Recommendations
Author(s) -
Ross Joseph S.,
Forsyth Beverly A.,
Rosenbaum Julie R.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
journal of general internal medicine
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.746
H-Index - 180
eISSN - 1525-1497
pISSN - 0884-8734
DOI - 10.1111/j.1525-1497.2005.0279.x
Subject(s) - medicine , cervical cancer , family medicine , cervical cancer screening , medline , cancer , gynecology , political science , law
Background: Postgraduate training involves intensive clinical education characterized by long work hours with minimal flexibility. Time demands may be a barrier to obtaining preventive care for housestaff during postgraduate training. Objective: Assess adherence to United States Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) cervical cancer screening recommendations. Design: Cross‐sectional survey. Participants: Convenience sample of female housestaff at 1 university hospital. Measurements: Primary outcomes included (1) adherence to USPSTF recommendations, (2) perception of adherence to recommendations, and (3) barriers to obtaining preventive care. Results: Surveys were completed by 204 housestaff. Overall, 81% of housestaff were adherent to USPSTF screening recommendations. Housestaff requiring screening in the past year were less likely to be adherent when compared with housestaff requiring screening in the past 3 years. Overall, 84% accurately perceived their screening behavior as adherent or nonadherent (κ=0.58). Of the 43% who identified a barrier to obtaining preventive care, not having time to schedule or keep appointments was reported most frequently ( n =72). Conclusions: Housestaff accurately perceived their need for cervical cancer screening and were generally adherent to USPSTF recommendations, even though lack of time during postgraduate training was frequently reported as a barrier to obtaining preventive care. However, we found lower adherence among a small subgroup of housestaff at a slightly greater risk for cervical disease and most likely to benefit from screening.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here