z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Overconfidence in Forecasts of Own Performance: An Experimental Study *
Author(s) -
Clark Jeremy,
Friesen Lana
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
the economic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.683
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1468-0297
pISSN - 0013-0133
DOI - 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2008.02211.x
Subject(s) - overconfidence effect , economics , econometrics , financial economics , psychology , social psychology
Systematic overconfidence by individuals regarding their abilities and prospects could have important economic consequences. But overconfidence has received little direct testing within economics. We use experiments to test for overconfidence in people's forecasts of their absolute or relative performance in two unfamiliar tasks. Given their chosen effort, participants have incentives to forecast accurately, with opportunities for feedback, learning and revision. Forecasts are evaluated at aggregate and individual levels. We find zero mean error or underconfidence far more prevalent than overconfidence. Underconfidence is greatest in forecasts of absolute rather than relative performance and among those using greater effort quantity or quality.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here