z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Confined chaotic motion in three‐body resonances: trapping of trans‐Neptunian material induced by gas‐drag
Author(s) -
De La Fuente Marcos R.,
De La Fuente Marcos C.
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-2966
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13385.x
Subject(s) - physics , neptune , planetesimal , resonance (particle physics) , uranus , planetary migration , trapping , astrophysics , mean motion , planet , drag , protoplanetary disk , context (archaeology) , celestial mechanics , orbital decay , giant planet , planetary system , astronomy , atomic physics , mechanics , ecology , paleontology , satellite , biology
Jiang & Yeh proposed gas‐drag‐induced resonant capture as a mechanism able to explain the dominant 3:2 resonance observed in the trans‐Neptunian belt. Using a model of a disc–star–planet system they concluded that gaseous drag in a protoplanetary disc can trap trans‐Neptunian object (TNO) embryos into the 3:2 resonance rather easily although it could not trap objects into the 2:1 resonance. Here we further investigate this scenario using numerical simulations within the context of the planar restricted four‐body problem by including both present‐day Uranus and Neptune. Our results show that mean motion and corotation resonances are possible and trapping into both the 3:2 and 2:1 resonances as well as other resonances is observed. The associated corotation centres may easily form larger planetesimals from smaller ones. Corotation resonances evolve into pure Lindblad resonances in a time‐scale of 0.5 Myr. The non‐linear corotation and mean motion resonances produced are very size selective. The 3:2 resonance is dominant for submetric particles but for larger particles the 2:1 resonance is stronger. In summary, our calculations show that confined chaotic motion around the resonances not only increases trapping efficiency but also the orbital eccentricities of the trapped material, modifying the relative abundance of trapped particles in different resonances. If we assume a more compact planetary system, instead of using the present‐day values of the orbital elements of Uranus and Neptune, our results remain largely unchanged.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here