Open AccessHow useful is the ‘mean stream’ in discussing meteoroid stream evolution?
Author(s) -
Williams I. P.,
Jones D. C.
Publication year - 2007
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-2966
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.11297.x
Subject(s) - meteoroid , physics , asteroid , solar system , orbit (dynamics) , planet , meteor shower , astronomy , orbital elements , astrophysics , meteor (satellite) , orbit determination , astrobiology , aerospace engineering , satellite , engineering
The current model for meteoroid formation involves particles being ejected from parent objects, usually comets and sometimes asteroids. The orbital speed of any body in the Solar system is much larger than any potential ejection speed of small particles from the body, hence the initial orbit of any meteoroid is fairly similar to that of the parent. However, with the passage of time the effects of gravitational perturbations from the planets and solar radiation will cause the orbits of the meteoroids to evolve away from the parent's orbit. Initially this may cause a meteor shower to occur, but eventually will lead to the dissipation of the stream. When modelling meteoroid streams, it is usually more convenient to use the average orbital elements of all the meteoroids to study their evolution. In this paper, we consider the evolution of the orbits of several sets of meteoroids comparing the effectiveness of using the mean and median values for a stream when modelling the overall evolution. We conclude that although both mean and median provide a good match to the evolution of the real meteoroids for most of the time interval studied, the mean orbit remains more consistently close to the stream.