Open AccessCosmological weak lensing with the HST GEMS survey
Author(s) -
Heymans Catherine,
Brown Michael L.,
Barden Marco,
Caldwell John A. R.,
Jahnke Knud,
Peng Chien Y.,
Rix HansWalter,
Taylor Andy,
Beckwith Steven V. W.,
Bell Eric F.,
Borch Andrea,
Häußler Boris,
Jogee Shardha,
McIntosh Daniel H.,
Meisenheimer Klaus,
Sánchez Sebastian F.,
Somerville Rachel,
Wisotzki Lutz,
Wolf Christian
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-2966
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09152.x
Subject(s) - physics , weak gravitational lensing , astrophysics , spectral density , point spread function , cosmic variance , galaxy , redshift , hubble deep field , dark matter , matter power spectrum , astronomy , optics , statistics , mathematics
We present our cosmic shear analysis of GEMS, one of the largest wide‐field surveys ever undertaken by the Hubble Space Telescope . Imaged with the Advanced Camera for Surveys (ACS), GEMS spans 795 arcmin 2 in the Chandra Deep Field South. We detect weak lensing by large‐scale structure in high‐resolution F606W GEMS data from ∼60 resolved galaxies per square arcminute. We measure the two‐point shear correlation function, the top‐hat shear variance and the shear power spectrum, performing an E/B mode decomposition for each statistic. We show that we are not limited by systematic errors and use our results to place joint constraints on the matter density parameter Ω m and the amplitude of the matter power spectrum σ 8 . We find σ 8 (Ω m /0.3) 0.65 = 0.68 ± 0.13 where the 1σ error includes both our uncertainty on the median redshift of the survey and sampling variance. Removing image and point spread function (PSF) distortions are crucial to all weak lensing analyses. We therefore include a thorough discussion on the degree of ACS PSF distortion and anisotropy which we characterize directly from GEMS data. Consecutively imaged over 20 d, GEMS data also allow us to investigate PSF instability over time. We find that, even in the relatively short GEMS observing period, the ACS PSF ellipticity varies at the level of a few per cent which we account for with a semi‐time‐dependent PSF model. Our correction for the temporal and spatial variability of the PSF is shown to be successful through a series of diagnostic tests.