z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Primordial non‐Gaussianity: local curvature method and statistical significance of constraints on f NL from WMAP data
Author(s) -
Cabella P.,
Liguori M.,
Hansen F. K.,
Marinucci D.,
Matarrese S.,
Moscardini L.,
Vittorio N.
Publication year - 2005
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-2966
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08833.x
Subject(s) - frequentist inference , cosmic microwave background , physics , non gaussianity , cmb cold spot , statistical physics , curvature , cosmic background radiation , gaussian , bayesian probability , statistics , bayesian inference , mathematics , quantum mechanics , geometry , anisotropy
We test the consistency of estimates of the non‐linear coupling constant f NL using non‐Gaussian cosmic microwave background (CMB) maps generated by the method described in the work of Liguori, Matarrese & Moscardini. This procedure to obtain non‐Gaussian maps differs significantly from the method used in previous works on the estimation of f NL . Nevertheless, using spherical wavelets, we find results in very good agreement with Mukherjee & Wang, showing that the two ways of generating primordial non‐Gaussian maps give equivalent results. Moreover, we introduce a new method for estimating the non‐linear coupling constant from CMB observations by using the local curvature of the temperature fluctuation field. We present both Bayesian credible regions (assuming a flat prior) and proper (frequentist) confidence intervals on f NL , and discuss the relation between the two approaches. The Bayesian approach tends to yield lower error bars than the frequentist approach, suggesting that a careful analysis of the different interpretations is needed. Using this method, we estimate f NL =−10 +270 −260 at the 2σ level (Bayesian) and f NL =−10 +310 −270 (frequentist). Moreover, we find that the wavelet and the local curvature approaches, which provide similar error bars, yield approximately uncorrelated estimates of f NL and therefore, as advocated in the work of Cabella et al., the estimates may be combined to reduce the error bars. In this way, we obtain f NL =−5 ± 85 and f NL =−5 ± 175 at the 1σ and 2σ level respectively using the frequentist approach.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here