z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
XMM–Newton observations of the merger‐remnant galaxies NGC 3921 and 7252
Author(s) -
Nolan L. A.,
Ponman T. J.,
Read A. M.,
Schweizer François
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
monthly notices of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.058
H-Index - 383
eISSN - 1365-2966
pISSN - 0035-8711
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08061.x
Subject(s) - physics , astrophysics , galaxy , astronomy , luminosity , active galactic nucleus , spectral line
Using the high sensitivity of XMM–Newton , we have studied the X‐ray emission of the two prototypical late‐stage merger remnants, NGC 3921 and 7252. In the case of NGC 7252, this is complemented by archival Chandra data. We investigate the nature of the discrete X‐ray point source populations and the hot diffuse gas components in these two galaxies, and compare them in the light of their different merger ages and histories. We detect three candidate ultraluminous X‐ray point sources (ULXs) in NGC 3921 and at least six in NGC 7252, for which we have high spatial resolution Chandra data. These have luminosities ranging from ∼1.4 × 10 39 –10 40 erg s −1 (for H 0 = 75 km s −1 Mpc −1 ). We expect these ULXs to be high‐mass X‐ray binaries, associated with the recent star formation in these two galaxies. Extended hot gas is observed in both galaxies. We have sufficient counts in the XMM–Newton data to fit two‐component hot plasma models to their X‐ray spectra, and estimate the X‐ray luminosities of the hot diffuse gas components to be 2.75 × 10 40 erg s −1 and 2.09 × 10 40 erg s −1 in NGC 3921 and 7252, respectively. These luminosities are low compared with the luminosities observed in typical mature elliptical galaxies ( L X ∼ 10 41 –10 42 erg s −1 ), into which these merger remnants are expected to evolve. We do not see evidence that the X‐ray haloes of these galaxies are currently being regenerated to the masses and luminosities seen in typical elliptical galaxies. The mass of atomic gas available to fall back into the main bodies of these galaxies and shock‐heat to X‐ray temperatures is insufficient for this to be the sole halo regeneration mechanism. We conclude that halo regeneration is most likely a long‐term (>10 Gyr) process, occurring predominantly via mass loss from evolving stars, in a subsonic outflow stage commencing ∼2 Gyr after the merging event.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here