z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
An extended version of the C 3 FM geomagnetic field model: application of a continuous frozen‐flux constraint
Author(s) -
Wardinski Ingo,
Lesur Vincent
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
geophysical journal international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0956-540X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2012.05384.x
Subject(s) - earth's magnetic field , field (mathematics) , secular variation , flux (metallurgy) , constraint (computer aided design) , geodesy , magnetic field , physics , mathematics , geology , geophysics , geometry , materials science , quantum mechanics , pure mathematics , metallurgy
SUMMARY A recently developed method of constructing core field models that satisfies a frozen‐flux constraint is used to built a field model covering 1957–2008. Like the previous model C 3 FM, we invert observatory secular variation data and adopt satellite‐based field models to constrain the field morphology in 1980 and 2004. To derive a frozen‐flux field model, we start from a field model that has been derived using ‘classical’ techniques, which is spatially and temporally smooth. This is achieved by using order six B‐splines as basis functions for the temporal evolution of the Gauss coefficients and requiring that the model minimizes the integral of the third‐time derivative of the field taken over the core surface. That guarantees a robust estimate of the secular acceleration. Comparisons between the ‘classical’ and the frozen‐flux field models are given, and we describe to what extend the frozen‐flux constraint is adhered. Our models allow the interpretation that magnetic diffusion does not contribute to the observed secular variation. Additionally, the resulting frozen‐flux field model shows a more or less constant spatial complexity, so that the spatial complexity of the magnetic field imposed by the 2004 satellite field model is maintained backward in time to the beginning of the model period, 1957. Therefore, we understand the frozen‐flux constraint as an instrument that aids the backward projection of high spatial resolution in core field models to earlier times.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here