z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Inner core–mantle gravitational locking and the super‐rotation of the inner core
Author(s) -
Dumberry Mathieu,
Mound Jon
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
geophysical journal international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0956-540X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04563.x
Subject(s) - inner core , mantle (geology) , outer core , geophysics , core–mantle boundary , physics , differential rotation , geology , earth's rotation , dynamo theory , angular momentum , geodesy , dynamo , classical mechanics , magnetic field , astrophysics , stars , quantum mechanics
SUMMARY Seismological observations suggest that the Earth's solid inner core has been rotating faster than the mantle over the past several decades, consistent with the results of some numerical geodynamo models. However, the hemispherical anisotropy structure of the inner core, also seismically observed, may require the inner core to remain at a relatively fixed longitudinal alignment with respect to the mantle, perhaps due to gravitational locking between them. Both of these seismic observations may be compatible if the differential rotation of the inner core is oscillatory in nature, with no mean offset over geologically long timescales. In this work, we investigate the possible rates of rotation of an oscillating inner core and the dynamics of coupling within the core–mantle system from an angular momentum perspective. We find that gravitational coupling between the inner core and mantle acts to prevent differential rotation, although the period at which ‘locking’ occurs differs depending on which of the inner core or mantle is driving the motion. We also show that for an internally generated torque, a long period (longer than 100 yr) oscillation of the inner core with a rate equal to 0.25° yr −1 , on the high end of the rates inferred from seismic observations, is possible. However, the mantle oscillations entrained by gravitational coupling in such a scenario are only marginally compatible with the observed changes in length of day. We show that, in order to explain the seismically inferred rotation rates, either the gravitational coupling must be lower than previous estimates, or the electromagnetic coupling at the core–mantle boundary must be stronger than typical estimates.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here