Open AccessChaotic system detection of weak seismic signals
Author(s) -
Li Y.,
Yang B. J.,
Badal J.,
Zhao X. P.,
Lin H. B.,
Li R. L.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
geophysical journal international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0956-540X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2009.04232.x
Subject(s) - duffing equation , noise (video) , signal (programming language) , wavelet , chaotic , acoustics , sampling (signal processing) , computer science , physics , control theory (sociology) , mathematics , mathematical analysis , optics , nonlinear system , quantum mechanics , artificial intelligence , control (management) , detector , image (mathematics) , programming language
SUMMARY When the signal‐to‐noise ( S / N ) ratio is less than −3 dB or even 0 dB, seismic events are generally difficult to identify from a common shot record. To overcome this type of problem we present a method to detect weak seismic signals based on the oscillations described by a chaotic dynamic system in phase space. The basic idea is that a non‐linear chaotic oscillator is strongly immune to noise. Such a dynamic system is less influenced by noise, but it is more sensitive to periodic signals, changing from a chaotic state to a large‐scale periodic phase state when excited by a weak signal. With the purpose of checking the possible contamination of the signal by noise, we have performed a numerical experiment with an oscillator controlled by the Duffing–Holmes equation, taking a distorted Ricker wavelet sequence as input signal. In doing so, we prove that the oscillator system is able to reach a large‐scale periodic phase state in a strong noise environment. In the case of a common shot record with low S / N ratio, the onsets reflected from a same interface are similar to one other and can be put on a single trace with a common reference time and the periodicity of the so‐generated signal follows as a consequence of moveout at a particular scanning velocity. This operation, which is called ‘horizontal dynamic correction’ and leads to a nearly periodic signal, is implemented on synthetic wavelet sequences taking various sampling arrival times and scanning velocities. Thereafter, two tests, both in a noisy ambient of −3.7 dB, are done using a chaotic oscillator: the first demonstrates the capability of the method to really detect a weak seismic signal; the second takes care of the fundamental weakness of the dynamic correction coming from the use of a particular scanning velocity, which is investigated from the effect caused by near‐surface lateral velocity variation on the periodicity of the reconstructed seismic signal. Finally, we have developed an application of the method to real data acquired in seismic prospecting and then converted into pseudo‐periodic signals, which has allowed us to discriminate fuzzy waveforms as multiples, thus illustrating in practice the performance of our working scheme.