z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Non‐parametric seismic data recovery with curvelet frames
Author(s) -
Herrmann Felix J.,
Hennenfent Gilles
Publication year - 2008
Publication title -
geophysical journal international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0956-540X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2007.03698.x
Subject(s) - curvelet , seismic inversion , compressed sensing , algorithm , inversion (geology) , computer science , geophysical imaging , parametric statistics , synthetic seismogram , sampling (signal processing) , data compression , synthetic data , geology , seismology , artificial intelligence , mathematics , computer vision , wavelet transform , statistics , wavelet , geometry , filter (signal processing) , azimuth , tectonics
SUMMARY Seismic data recovery from data with missing traces on otherwise regular acquisition grids forms a crucial step in the seismic processing flow. For instance, unsuccessful recovery leads to imaging artefacts and to erroneous predictions for the multiples, adversely affecting the performance of multiple elimination. A non‐parametric transform‐based recovery method is presented that exploits the compression of seismic data volumes by recently developed curvelet frames. The elements of this transform are multidimensional and directional and locally resemble wave fronts present in the data, which leads to a compressible representation for seismic data. This compression enables us to formulate a new curvelet‐based seismic data recovery algorithm through sparsity‐promoting inversion. The concept of sparsity‐promoting inversion is in itself not new to geophysics. However, the recent insights from the field of ‘compressed sensing’ are new since they clearly identify the three main ingredients that go into a successful formulation of a recovery problem, namely a sparsifying transform, a sampling strategy that subdues coherent aliases and a sparsity‐promoting program that recovers the largest entries of the curvelet‐domain vector while explaining the measurements. These concepts are illustrated with a stylized experiment that stresses the importance of the degree of compression by the sparsifying transform. With these findings, a curvelet‐based recovery algorithms is developed, which recovers seismic wavefields from seismic data volumes with large percentages of traces missing. During this construction, we benefit from the main three ingredients of compressive sampling, namely the curvelet compression of seismic data, the existence of a favourable sampling scheme and the formulation of a large‐scale sparsity‐promoting solver based on a cooling method. The recovery performs well on synthetic as well as real data by virtue of the sparsifying property of curvelets. Our results are applicable to other areas such as global seismology.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here