z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Crustal structure of the Middle Urals based on reprocessing of Russian seismic reflection data
Author(s) -
Steer David N.,
Knapp James H.,
Brown Larry D.,
Rybalka Alexander V.,
Sokolov Vadim B.
Publication year - 1995
Publication title -
geophysical journal international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0956-540X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1995.tb06883.x
Subject(s) - terrane , geology , fibrous joint , crust , seismology , craton , tectonics , foreland basin , fault (geology) , basement , island arc , paleontology , subduction , medicine , civil engineering , anatomy , engineering
SUMMARY Reprocessed Russian seismic reflection data, combined with existing Russian geological maps and seismic interpretations, provide the basis for a revised tectonic interpretation of the upper crust in the Middle Urals. The Main Uralian Fault (MUF)—the principal suture of the Urals separating the East European Craton to the west from accreted terranes to the east—is found to penetrate to depths of at least 18 km, and perhaps much deeper, with a uniform eastward dip of 35° (after migration). As the MUF appears to truncate reflections in both the foreland and hinterland of the Urals, it is arguably one of the youngest structural features of the orogen. Basement rocks of the East European Platform underthrust the suture and comprise the deep crust a minimum of 30 km east of the surface expression of the MUF. The Tagil volcanic arc complex, greater than 1000 km in length along strike, comprises at least the upper 10 km of the crust east of the MUF. This terrane shallows eastwards, where it appears to be truncated by the west‐dipping Serov‐Mauk fault based on correlation with surface geology. The hinterland of the Urals, east of the MUF, is characterized by a previously unrecognized zone of discontinuous mid‐crustal reflectivity at depths of 14–16 km that is discordant with upper crustal reflections. This mid‐crustal zone of reflectivity is interpreted to represent either a major subhorizontal structural detachment or a zone of magmatic intrusion.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here