z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Scaled physical modelling of anisotropic wave propagation: multioffset profiles over an orthorhombic medium
Author(s) -
Brown R. James,
Lawton Don C.,
Cheadle Scott P.
Publication year - 1991
Publication title -
geophysical journal international
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0956-540X
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1991.tb01428.x
Subject(s) - transverse isotropy , anisotropy , attenuation , shear waves , geometry , isotropy , offset (computer science) , optics , physics , slab , wave propagation , plane symmetry , geology , principal axis theorem , polarization (electrochemistry) , shear (geology) , computational physics , mathematics , geophysics , petrology , chemistry , computer science , programming language
Summary In this paper we report further results of scaled physical modelling experiments in the laboratory in which ultrasonic elastic waves are propagated through an anisotropic medium of orthorhombic symmetry. Whereas our earlier experiments consisted for the most part in sending and receiving on opposite faces of a small cube of phenolic laminate, these new results are from multioffset profiles run parallel and at 45d̀ to principal directions on a larger slab of phenolic. The variation of NMO velocity with offset (or angle of incidence) has been determined for compressional and transverse shear waves along profiles in the two principal directions on the 3‐face (parallel to laminations) of the slab. These observed group velocities differ from the exact theoretical values by a maximum of about 1 per cent or less and also compare favourably with the theoretical velocities calculated from Thomsen's first‐order equations, with maximum differences of about 2 per cent. Differences between the observed and theoretical velocities are attributed to some combination of finite transducer size (geometrical or effective path length effects, array attenuation effects, or interference with the otherwise free surface), sample inhomogeneity and/or anelasticity, and experimental error. The transmission shot gathers acquired for propagation in symmetry planes, and for source‐receiver pairs with the same polarization, are similar in form to records acquired over a transversely isotropic medium. The effect of the shear‐wave window and the variation of the hyperbolic NMO parameter with offset are clearly seen. Transmission records were also acquired in off‐symmetry planes, namely along profiles at 45d̀ to principal directions. On these records, which include all nine possible pairs of source‐receiver polarizations, we see clear shear‐wave splitting at and near zero offset and more complicated wave effects with increasing offset, such as one or another wave phase dying out. This could be due to cusping of wave surfaces or rapid changes of amplitude and/or polarization with ray direction, possibly as consequences of nearby shear‐wave singularities.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here