z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Shear‐wave polarizations on a curved wavefront at an isotropic free surface
Author(s) -
Booth David C.,
Crampin Stuart
Publication year - 1985
Publication title -
geophysical journal of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0016-8009
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1985.tb05154.x
Subject(s) - seismogram , isotropy , wavefront , polarization (electrochemistry) , optics , physics , point source , anisotropy , shear (geology) , amplitude , geometry , shear waves , geology , seismology , mathematics , petrology , chemistry
Summary. We present polarization diagrams of the particle motions at the free surface of an isotropic half‐space generated by incident shear waves from a local buried point source. The reflectivity technique is used to calculate synthetic seismograms from which the particle motions are plotted. The particle motions are examined over a range of epicentral distances in a uniform isotropic half‐space for different source frequencies and polarization angles, and for different Poisson's ratios. The particle motions due to a curved wavefront possess different characteristics from those generated by plane wavefronts at corresponding incidence angles. A curved wavefront generates a local SP ‐phase: a P ‐headwave which propagates along the free surface, and arrives shortly before the direct S ‐wave. These two arrivals give rise to cruciform particle motions in the sagittal and horizontal planes, which could be misinterpreted as anisotropy‐induced shear‐wave splitting. An examination of the particle motion in the transverse plane, mutually orthogonal to the sagittal and horizontal planes, can be used to discriminate between isotropic and anisotropic interpretations. The amplitude of the SP ‐phase is enhanced when it propagates in a low‐velocity surface layer overlying the source layer, and may then become the dominant phase on radial‐component seismograms. The presence of even a single surface layer may introduce considerable complexity into the seismogram, and we examine the effects of layer thickness, velocity contrast, and source depth on the corresponding polarization diagrams. Reliable information on the source and propagation path characteristics of shear waves from a buried local point source can only be obtained from free‐surface records if they are recorded within a very limited epicentral distance range.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here