
B ‐polarization induction in two generalized thin sheets at the surface of a conducting half‐space
Author(s) -
Dawsonn T. W.,
Weaver J. T.,
Raval U.
Publication year - 1982
Publication title -
geophysical journal of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.302
H-Index - 168
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0016-8009
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1982.tb04945.x
Subject(s) - resistive touchscreen , half space , discontinuity (linguistics) , gravitational singularity , boundary value problem , mathematical analysis , geometry , polarization (electrochemistry) , electrical resistivity and conductivity , mechanics , geophysics , physics , mathematics , chemistry , quantum mechanics , electrical engineering , engineering
Summary. A new closed‐form solution is obtained analytically for a B‐ polarization induction problem of geophysical interest, in which a local region of the Earth is represented by a generalized thin sheet at the surface of and in electrical contact with a uniformly conducting half‐space. The generalized sheet, first introduced by Ranganayaki & Madden, is a mathematical idealization of a double layer which consists, in this problem, of two adjacent half‐planes with distinct conductances representing a surface conductivity discontinuity such as an ocean—coast boundary, underlain by a uniform sheet of finite integrated resistivity representing the lower crust. The resistive sheet exerts a considerable mathematical influence on the solution causing, under certain conditions, an additional pole to appear in one of the forms of contour integral by which the solution can be expressed; it also weakens or eliminates field singularities that would otherwise occur at the conductance discontinuity. A numerical calculation is made for model parameters typifying an ocean—coast boundary underlain by a highly resistive crust. It is found that the residue of the pole associated with the resistive sheet dominates the solution for this example, the main consequence of which is a huge increase in the horizontal range over which the induced currents adjust themselves between the different ‘skin‐effect’ distributions at infinity on either side of the model. Moreover the solution shows that this ‘adjustment distance’ has a more complicated dependence on the conductance and integrated resistivity of the sheet than that given simply by the square root of their product which was the length parameter proposed by Ranganayaki & Madden.