z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A Comparison of Adaptive Processing Techniques with N th Root Beam Forming Methods
Author(s) -
Ram A.,
Mereu R. F.
Publication year - 1975
Publication title -
geophysical journal of the royal astronomical society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
eISSN - 1365-246X
pISSN - 0016-8009
DOI - 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1975.tb05885.x
Subject(s) - slowness , azimuth , algorithm , computer science , wavelet , signal processing , noise (video) , signal (programming language) , geology , mathematics , geometry , digital signal processing , seismology , computer vision , computer hardware , image (mathematics) , programming language
Summary Small differences in slowness and azimuth for overlapping phases especially where the branches of the travel‐time curve are triplicated must be resolved for a meaningful inversion of array data. A computer program package has been written in F ORTRAN IV which enables a user to determine, automatically, the apparent azimuth and slowness of any portion of the seismic wavetrain recorded at various arrays if he has the raw data on digital tape and has access to any modern computer. These programs make use of two methods, (i) adaptive processing, and (ii) N th root beam forming which have been compared to determine the apparent azimuth and slowness of the seismic wavelets. The former method is performed by cross correlating the signal on each channel with a velocity and azimuth filtered trace in an iterative manner until the convergence takes place. In the latter method the operation is done by delaying the various channels to align a group of arrivals with a particular velocity and azimuth; taking the N th root of the signal; summing and then raising the result to the N th power. The value of apparent velocity and azimuth which produces a maximum filtered signal is determined. Experiments with clean and noisy synthetic data have shown that the adaptive processing method is more successful for resolving small differences in apparent velocity and azimuth of overlapping wavelets. It also has an advantage that a set of residuals may easily be obtained from the analysis. The N th root method is extremely powerful in enhancing the signal to noise ratio at the expense of signal distortion. The computation time for both methods is about the same.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here