z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The evolutionary radiation of modern birds (Neornithes): reconciling molecules, morphology and the fossil record
Author(s) -
DYKE GARETH J.,
VAN TUINEN MARCEL
Publication year - 2004
Publication title -
zoological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.148
H-Index - 83
eISSN - 1096-3642
pISSN - 0024-4082
DOI - 10.1111/j.1096-3642.2004.00118.x
Subject(s) - molecular clock , biology , clade , fossil record , extant taxon , phylogenetic tree , vertebrate , evolutionary biology , taxon , adaptive radiation , paleontology , phylogenetics , macroevolution , ecology , biochemistry , gene
The pattern, timing and extent of the evolutionary radiation of anatomically modern birds (Neornithes) remains contentious: dramatically different timescales for this major event in vertebrate evolution have been recovered by the ‘clock‐like’ modelling of molecular sequence data and from evidence extracted from the known fossil record. Because current synthesis would lead us to believe that fossil and nonfossil evidence conflict with regard to the neornithine timescale, especially at its base, it is high time that available data are reconciled to determine more exactly the evolutionary radiation of modern birds. In this review we highlight current understanding of the early fossil history of Neornithes in conjunction with available phylogenetic resolution for the major extant clades, as well as recent advancements in genetic methods that have constrained time estimates for major evolutionary divergences. Although the use of molecular approaches for timing the radiation of Neornithes is emphasized, the tenet of this review remains the fossil record of the major neornithine subdivisions and better‐preserved taxa. Fossils allowing clear phylogenetic constraint of taxa are central to future work in the production of accurate molecular calibrations of the neornithine evolutionary timescale. © 2004 The Linnean Society of London, Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2004, 141 , 153–177.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here