z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Genetic variation within and between Iliamna corei and I. remota (Malvaceae): implications for species delimitation
Author(s) -
BODO SLOTTA T. A.,
PORTER D. M.
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
botanical journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.872
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1095-8339
pISSN - 0024-4074
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8339.2006.00514.x
Subject(s) - biology , analysis of molecular variance , ordination , genetic variation , gene flow , genetic diversity , evolutionary biology , endangered species , population , microsatellite , taxon , ecology , genetics , allele , gene , demography , habitat , sociology
Iliamna corei and I. remota are classified as endangered species; however, their designation as separate species has been questioned. In order to address this problem, intersimple sequence repeat (ISSR) data were generated to examine patterns of genetic differentiation within and between these two taxa. ISSRs were used to screen individuals for genetic diversity of I. corei from the single known natural population and two garden populations, and individuals of I. remota from the six natural populations and four garden populations. Using ten primers, 140 informative markers were generated. Ninety‐four percent of loci detected revealed polymorphisms. Cluster analysis (neighbour‐joining, NJ) revealed that the two species are genetically distinct and that the Illinois populations of I. remota were genetically distinct from the Virginia populations of I. remota . Ordination by Principal Coordinate Analysis (PCoA) supported the findings of the NJ, with a separation of I. corei and I. remota . Analysis of Molecular Variance (AMOVA) revealed that the majority of variation detected was within populations, which is consistent with other self‐incompatible plants. The results indicate a correlation between the geographical distributions of the species and gene flow. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society , 2006, 151 , 345–354.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here