z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Different pathways are involved in the early development of the transient oral apparatus in anuran tadpoles (Anura: Leiuperidae)
Author(s) -
CANDIOTI FLORENCIA VERA,
HAAD BELÉN,
BALDO DIEGO,
KOLENC FRANCISCO,
BORTEIRO CLAUDIO,
ALTIG RONALD
Publication year - 2011
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2011.01727.x
Subject(s) - biology , heterochrony , ontogeny , anatomy , dorsum , zoology , evolutionary biology , genetics
The oral apparatus of anuran tadpoles is a unique structure composed of soft and keratinized parts surrounding the mouth. Among the many variations, a common oral apparatus involves a dorsal gap in the marginal papillae, keratinized jaw sheaths, and two upper and three lower rows of labial teeth. In Leiuperidae, besides this generalized morphology, four configurations are distinguished by the arrangement of the lower marginal papillae and the number of lower tooth rows. Study of the early oral ontogeny in 12 species representing these five configurations shows variations in the development of the lower marginal papillae and the third lower labial tooth row. Similar configurations may result from similar pathways (e.g. Physalaemus cuvieri group and Pseudopaludicola falcipes ) or different pathways (e.g. generalized oral discs of Pleurodema and Physalaemus ). Different oral configurations may result from overlapping trajectories ending at different stages (e.g. Physalaemus riograndensis and Ph. biligonigerus ) or different trajectories (e.g. Ph. henselii and Ph. gracilis ). Further studies are needed to interpret the role that heterochrony has played in evolutionary change within this family. The unsuspected variation occurring in this transient structure highlights its evolutionary potential and might be insightful in studies of anuran phylogenies that are largely based on adult characters. © 2011 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2011, 104 , 330–345.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here