z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Sex‐specific evolution of bite performance in Liolaemus lizards (Iguania: Liolaemidae): the battle of the sexes
Author(s) -
VANHOOYDONCK BIEKE,
CRUZ FELIX B.,
ABDALA CRISTIAN S.,
AZÓCAR DÉBORA L. MORENO,
BONINO MARCELO F.,
HERREL ANTHONY
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01519.x
Subject(s) - biology , sexual dimorphism , sexual selection , natural selection , lizard , zoology , bite force quotient , sauria , variation (astronomy) , stabilizing selection , evolutionary biology , ecology , selection (genetic algorithm) , genetic variation , genetics , gene , artificial intelligence , computer science , astrophysics , physics
Although differential selective pressures on males and females of the same species may result in sex‐specific evolutionary trajectories, comparative studies of adaptive radiations have largely neglected within‐species variation. In this study, we explore the potential effects of natural selection, sexual selection, or a combination of both, on bite performance in males and females of 19 species of Liolaemus lizards. More specifically, we study the evolution of bite performance, and compare evolutionary relationships between the variation in head morphology, bite performance, ecological variation and sexual dimorphism between males and females. Our results suggest that in male Liolaemus , the variation in bite force is at least partly explained by the variation in the degree of sexual dimorphism in head width (i.e. our estimate of the intensity of sexual selection), and neither bite force nor the morphological variables were correlated with diet (i.e. our proxy for natural selection). On the contrary, in females, the variation in bite force and head size can, to a certain extent, be explained by variation in diet. These results suggest that whereas in males, sexual selection seems to be operating on bite performance, in the case of females, natural selection seems to be the most likely and most important selective pressure driving the variation in head size. © 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2010, 101 , 461–475.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here