z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Fitting the bill: do different winter food resources influence juniper titmouse ( Baeolophus ridgwayi ) bill morphology?
Author(s) -
FRANCIS CLINTON D.,
GURALNICK ROBERT P.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01500.x
Subject(s) - juniper , biology , woodland , passerine , morphology (biology) , ecology , range (aeronautics) , variation (astronomy) , zoology , materials science , physics , astrophysics , composite material
Divergent adaptive selection is a prominent mechanism influencing patterns of morphological diversity. We used the juniper titmouse [ Baeolophus ridgwayi ( Richmond , 1902)], a nonmigratory passerine that inhabits woodlands throughout western North America, to investigate variation in bill morphology in relation to diet and geography. We gathered data from museum specimens and used morphometric techniques to determine the relative strength of support for competing hypotheses using information theoretics: (1) differences in bill morphology are predicted by a key winter food resource that each regional population consumes (seeds of different juniper tree species); or (2) bill morphology scales with body size, and both increase along a latitudinal gradient. Juniper species emerged as the variable with the most support explaining variation in bill size, supporting the hypothesis that seed sizes influence bill size, independently of body size. The shape analysis revealed no distinct patterns in bill shape variation, but employed a powerful method for evaluating the strength of support for numerous candidate models. The differences in bill size of juniper titmice across their range are likely to reflect adaptive variation, because bill morphology is highly heritable in birds, juniper titmouse gene flow appears to be relatively low, and there is a clear mechanistic explanation for why bill sizes may differ among the ranges of the three juniper species. © 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2010, 101 , 667–679.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here