z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Morphofunctional patterns in Neotropical felids: species co‐existence and historical assembly
Author(s) -
MORALES MIRIAM M.,
GIANNINI NORBERTO P.
Publication year - 2010
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2010.01461.x
Subject(s) - biology , guild , ecology , interspecific competition , clade , habitat , ecomorphology , phylogenetic tree , biogeography , niche , ecological niche , biochemistry , gene
Extant felids are morphologically homogeneous, probably as a result of recent radiation and constraints from their predatory specializations. The Neotropical assemblage comprises 12 of the 41 extant felid species, which occupy all habitats available, with many species coexisting locally. We studied this assemblage on the basis of 31 craniodental variables reflecting morphofunctional variation, measured from 229 specimens representing all 12 species. Multivariate patterns were summarized allowing for phylogenetic covariation. Additional factors (geographical distribution, use of habitat and stratum, and activity pattern) were coded for each species. As expected, body size accounted for most variation, covarying with membership to three deep clades and, to a lesser extent, with large‐scale geographic variation. The species tend to segregate in morphospace plus one or more factors (e.g. habits) that make interspecific overlap in niche space minimal. Using dated phylogenies, biogeographic history, and the fossil record, we reconstructed the historical assembly of the Neotropical felid guild. We found a pattern of successive invasions and speciation in which new lineages occupied previously vacant areas of morphospace, or new species occupied overlapping areas but with contrasting habits. This may be general among antagonistic species of historically structured guilds, and we predict similar patterns in other continents. © 2010 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 2010, 100 , 711–724.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here