z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Frequency of fault bars in feathers of birds and susceptibility to predation
Author(s) -
MØLLER ANDERS PAPE,
ERRITZØE JOHANNES,
NIELSEN JAN TØTTRUP
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2009.01204.x
Subject(s) - accipiter , predation , feather , biology , fault (geology) , population , ecology , zoology , demography , paleontology , sociology
Fault bars are transparent bands in the feathers of birds produced under stressful and adverse conditions. The frequency of feathers with fault bars is highly heterogeneous among species. We predicted that prey had a higher frequency of fault bars than individuals from the general population, and that a high susceptibility to predation would be associated with a low frequency of fault bars among species of birds because such species would suffer particularly high costs of producing fault bars. The frequency of fault bars in prey was almost three‐fold higher than in the general population, based on a database on the frequency of fault bars and susceptibility to predation by the goshawk Accipiter gentilis L., implying intense natural selection against fault bars. A high susceptibility to predation by the sparrowhawk Accipiter nisus L. and the goshawk, relative to what would be expected from their abundance, was associated with a low frequency of fault bars across species, with long distance migration also being negatively associated with frequency of fault bars. Feathers with fault bars were more likely to break than feathers without fault bars, thereby potentially affecting the flight ability of individuals. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that susceptibility to factors that cause production of fault bars can be modified by natural selection, as illustrated by the impact of predation on the frequency of fault bars. © 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2009, 97 , 334–345.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here