z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Preferences and predispositions of female canaries ( Serinus canaria ) for loud intensity of male sexy phrases
Author(s) -
PASTEAU MAGALI,
NAGLE LAURENT,
KREUTZER MICHEL
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01136.x
Subject(s) - phrase , preference , audiology , biology , intensity (physics) , psychology , communication , mathematics , linguistics , physics , statistics , medicine , philosophy , quantum mechanics
In the present study, we tested the effect of song amplitude on intersexual relationships. To evaluate preferences and predispositions of female canaries for amplitude levels of male song, we conducted two experiments using both females raised in acoustic isolation and females raised in an aviary under ‘normal’ acoustic conditions. The songs used in both experiments followed the same pattern: one reactive phrase surrounded by two nonreactive phrases. The first experiment consisted of testing female preferences for weak, normal, or loud amplitudes of the reactive phrase (i.e. these reactive phrases provoke sexual stimulation in females). In a second experiment, we tested female preferences for weak, normal, or loud amplitudes of the nonreactive phrases. These two experiments allowed us to evaluate female preferences for intensity levels of reactive and nonreactive phrases. In the first experiment, all females significantly prefered loud and normal reactive phrases, whereas the second experiment showed that loud nonreactive phrases do not necessarily provoke more responses than other nonreactive phrases. Female canaries were, thus, more stimulated by the intensity level of a particular part of the song. Both females raised in acoustic isolation and in normal acoustic conditions responded in the same way. We can therefore suppose that learning, through acoustic experience, has little influence on preference development for amplitude levels. © 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2009, 96 , 808–814.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here