z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Parasites may contribute to ‘magic trait’ evolution in the adaptive radiation of three‐spined sticklebacks, Gasterosteus aculeatus (Gasterosteiformes: Gasterosteidae)
Author(s) -
MACCOLL ANDREW D. C.
Publication year - 2009
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2008.01123.x
Subject(s) - biology , gasterosteus , sympatric speciation , ecology , natural selection , trait , three spined stickleback , zoology , population , ecological speciation , evolutionary biology , genetic variation , fish <actinopterygii> , demography , fishery , computer science , programming language , gene flow , biochemistry , sociology , gene
In the past decade, there has been a new effort to understand the ecology that drives population divergence and speciation. It is well established in theory that speciation is most likely to occur when a trait that is under divergent natural selection in different populations is also used in mate choice. Such traits have been dubbed ‘magic traits’ (Gavrilets, 2004) and, although there appears to be good evidence that they exist, the ecological mechanisms that underlie their divergence are not well understood. Size at maturity in three‐spined sticklebacks is an archetypal example of a magic trait. The present study documents for the first time that differences in body size at maturity in sympatric species pairs of lacustrine three‐spined sticklebacks in British Columbia, Canada, are caused by differences in age at maturity. It is also shown that there are differences between the sympatric species in the patterns of infection with a virulent cestode, Schistocephalus solidus . Although the evidence is circumstantial, these differences in infection are consistent with the hypothesis that they have contributed to the observed divergence in age and size at maturity in these populations. © 2009 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2009, 96 , 425–433.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here