z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Beak morphology and song features covary in a population of Darwin’s finches ( Geospiza fortis )
Author(s) -
HUBER SARAH K.,
PODOS JEFFREY
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00638.x
Subject(s) - beak , biology , population , natural selection , zoology , assortative mating , morphology (biology) , mating , evolutionary biology , demography , sociology
Animal mating signals evolve in part through indirect natural selection on anatomical traits that influence signal expression. In songbirds, for example, natural selection on beak form and function can influence the evolution of song features, because of the role of the beak in song production. In this study we characterize the relationship between beak morphology and song features within a bimodal population of Geospiza fortis on Santa Cruz Island, Galápagos. This is the only extant population of Darwin’s finches that is known to possess a bimodal distribution in beak size. We test the hypothesis that birds with larger beaks are constrained to produce songs with lower frequencies and decreased vocal performance. We find that birds with longer, deeper, and wider beaks produce songs with significantly lower minimum frequencies, maximum frequencies and frequency bandwidths. Results from the analysis of the relationship between beak morphology and trill rate are mixed. Measures of beak morphology correlated positively with ‘vocal deviation’, a composite index of vocal performance. Overall these results support a resonance model of vocal tract function, and suggest that beak morphology, a primary target of ecological selection in Darwin’s finches, affects the evolution of mating signals. We suggest that differences in song between the two modes of the distribution may influence mate recognition and perhaps facilitate assortative mating by beak size and population divergence. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2006, 88 , 489–498.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here