z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Genetic divergence and echolocation call frequency in cryptic species of Hipposideros larvatus s.l . (Chiroptera: Hipposideridae) from the Indo‐Malayan region
Author(s) -
THABAH ADORA,
ROSSITER STEPHEN J.,
KINGSTON TIGGA,
ZHANG SHUYI,
PARSONS STUART,
MYA KHIN MYA,
AKBAR ZUBAID,
JONES GARETH
Publication year - 2006
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00602.x
Subject(s) - biology , human echolocation , monophyly , zoology , allopatric speciation , phylogenetic tree , evolutionary biology , clade , population , biochemistry , neuroscience , gene , demography , sociology
The intermediate leaf‐nosed bat ( Hipposideros larvatus ) is a medium‐sized bat distributed throughout the Indo‐Malay region. In north‐east India, bats identified as H. larvatus captured at a single cave emitted echolocation calls with a bimodal distribution of peak frequencies, around either 85 kHz or 98 kHz. Individuals echolocating at 85 kHz had larger ears and longer forearms than those echolocating at 98 kHz, although no differences were detected in either wing morphology or diet, suggesting limited resource partitioning. A comparison of mitochondrial control region haplotypes of the two phonic types with individuals sampled from across the Indo‐Malay range supports the hypothesis that, in India, two cryptic species are present. The Indian 98‐kHz phonic bats formed a monophyletic clade with bats from all other regional populations sampled, to the exclusion of the Indian 85‐kHz bats. In India, the two forms showed 12–13% sequence divergence and we propose that the name Hipposideros khasiana for bats of the 85‐kHz phonic type. Bats of the 98‐kHz phonic type formed a monophyletic group with bats from Myanmar, and corresponded to Hipposideros grandis , which is suggested to be a species distinct from Hipposideros larvatus . Differences in echolocation call frequency among populations did not reflect phylogenetic relationships, indicating that call frequency is a poor indicator of evolutionary history. Instead, divergence in call frequency probably occurs in allopatry, possibly augmented by character displacement on secondary contact to facilitate intraspecific communication. © 2006 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2006, 88 , 119–130.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here