Variability and size in mammals and birds

Body size, its variability, and their ecological correlates have long been important topics in evolutionary biology. Yet, the question of whether there is a general relationship between size and size‐relative variability has not previously been addressed. Through an analysis of body‐mass and length measurements from 65 074 individuals from 351 mammalian species, we show that size‐relative variability increases significantly with mean species body size. Analysis of mean body mass and standard deviations for 237 species of birds revealed the same pattern. We present three plausible alternatives explanations and eliminate several others. Of these, the hypothesis that the increase in size‐relative variability with mean body mass is related to the scaling of body mass components is most strongly supported. In effect, larger mammals and birds are more variable because their body mass is composed to greater relative degree of components with higher intrinsic variability (bone, fat, and muscle). In contrast, smaller mammals and birds have lower body mass variability because they are composed to a greater relative extent of components (viscera and nervous system) in which size variation is more highly constrained by energetic and functional factors.