Are Feminism and Competition Compatible?
Author(s) -
Cawston Amanda
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
hypatia
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.506
H-Index - 28
eISSN - 1527-2001
pISSN - 0887-5367
DOI - 10.1111/hypa.12222
Subject(s) - scarcity , competition (biology) , feminism , argument (complex analysis) , context (archaeology) , opposition (politics) , oppression , sociology , positive economics , political science , economics , gender studies , law , market economy , politics , history , ecology , biochemistry , chemistry , archaeology , biology
Contemporary feminist interest in the persistent underrepresentation of women in top professions suggests an implicit approval of the competition required to achieve these posts. Competition, however, seems to be in tension with feminist opposition to domination and oppression. This paper outlines the dimensions of this tension and examines three attempts to resolve the incompatibility. The first two try to separate the undesirable elements of competition from the positive by way of the competitiveness/competition and the challenge/scarcity distinctions. I argue that these distinctions fail to alleviate worries about competition, particularly in the context of the professions. Meanwhile, the third reconciliatory attempt offers a pragmatic argument for compatibilism based on the value of women's participation in the professions (and their associated competitions). Although this pragmatic argument has some merit, I argue that it significantly overestimates the amount of competition acceptable for feminist participation. The end result is that, within the context of the professions, competition remains fundamentally in tension with feminism.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom