Open AccessExpectations of a new opt‐out system of consent for deceased organ donation in England: A qualitative interview study
Author(s) -
Bailey Pippa K.,
Lyons Hannah,
Caskey Fergus J.,
BenShlomo Yoav,
AlTalib Mohammed,
Babu Adarsh,
Selman Lucy E.
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
health expectations
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 1.314
H-Index - 74
eISSN - 1369-7625
pISSN - 1369-6513
DOI - 10.1111/hex.13394
Subject(s) - snowball sampling , legislation , thematic analysis , organ donation , focus group , health care , family medicine , qualitative research , medicine , nonprobability sampling , transplantation , stakeholder , opt out , donation , nursing , psychology , public relations , political science , population , law , surgery , sociology , environmental health , anthropology , world wide web , computer science , social science , pathology
In 2020 England moved to an opt‐out deceased donation law. We aimed to investigate the views of a mixed stakeholder group comprising people with kidney disease, family members and healthcare practitioners towards the change in legislation. We investigated the expected impacts of the new legislation on deceased‐donor and living‐donor transplantation, and views on media campaigns regarding the law change. Methods We undertook in‐depth qualitative interviews with people with kidney disease ( n = 13), their family members ( n = 4) and healthcare practitioners ( n = 15). Purposive sampling was used to ensure diversity for patients and healthcare practitioners. Family members were recruited through snowball sampling and posters. Interviews were audio‐recorded and transcribed verbatim. Transcripts were analysed using thematic analysis. Results Three themes with six subthemes were identified: (i) Expectations of impact (Hopeful patients; Cautious healthcare professionals), (ii) Living‐donor transplantation (Divergent views; Unchanged clinical recommendations), (iii) Media campaigns (Single message; Highlighting recipient benefits). Patients expected the law change would result in more deceased‐donor transplant opportunities. Conclusions Clinicians should ensure patients and families are aware of the current evidence regarding the impact of opt‐out consent: expectations of an increased likelihood of receiving a deceased‐donor transplant are not currently supported by the evidence. This may help to prevent a decline in living‐donor transplantation seen in other countries with similar legislation. Media campaigns should include a focus on the impact of organ receipt. Patient or Public Contribution Two patient representatives from the Kidney Disease Health Integration Team, Primrose Granville and Soumeya Bouacida, contributed to the content and design of the study documents.