z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Harrod 1939
Author(s) -
Blume Lawrence E.,
Sargent Thomas J.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
the economic journal
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 4.683
H-Index - 160
eISSN - 1468-0297
pISSN - 0013-0133
DOI - 10.1111/ecoj.12224
Subject(s) - economics , neoclassical economics , reading (process) , growth theory , centrality , keynesian economics , philosophy , linguistics , mathematics , combinatorics
Harrod's 1939 ‘Essay in Dynamic Theory' is celebrated as one of the foundational papers in the modern theory of economic growth. Linked eternally to Evsey Domar, he appears in the undergraduate and graduate macroeconomics curricula, and his ‘fundamental equation’ appears as the central result of the AK model in modern textbooks. Reading his Essay today, however, the reasons for his centrality are less clear. Looking forward from 1939, we see that the main stream of economic growth theory is built on neoclassical distribution theory rather than on the Keynesian principles Harrod deployed. Looking back, we see that there were many antecedent developments in growth economics, some much closer than Harrod's to contemporary developments. So what, then, did Harrod accomplish?

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here