Administrative coding is specific, but not sensitive, for identifying eosinophilic esophagitis

Summary The use of administrative databases to conduct population‐based studies of eosinophilic esophagitis ( EoE ) in the U nited S tates is limited because it is unknown whether the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision ( ICD ‐9) code for EoE , 530.13, accurately identifies those who truly have the disease. The aim of this retrospective study was to validate the ICD ‐9 code for identifying cases of EoE in administrative data. Confirmed cases of EoE as per consensus guidelines (symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and ≥ 15 eosinophils per high‐power field on biopsy after 8 weeks of twice daily proton pump inhibitor therapy) were identified in the University of N orth C arolina ( UNC ) EoE Clinicopathologic Database from 2008 to 2010; 2008 was the first year in which the 530.13 code was approved. Using the C arolina Data Warehouse, the administrative database for patients seen in the UNC system, all diagnostic and procedure codes were obtained for these cases. Then, with the EoE cases as the reference standard, we re‐queried the C arolina Data Warehouse over the same time frame for all patients seen in the system ( n  = 308 372) and calculated the sensitivity and specificity of the ICD ‐9 code 530.13 as a case definition of EoE . To attempt to refine the case definition, we added procedural codes in an iterative fashion to optimize sensitivity and specificity, and restricted our analysis to privately insured patients. We also conducted a sensitivity analysis with 2011 data to identify trends in the operating parameters of the code. We identified 226 cases of EoE at UNC to serve as the reference standard. The ICD ‐9 code 530.13 yielded a sensitivity of 37% (83/226; 95% confidence interval: 31–43%) and specificity of 99% (308 111/308 146; 95% confidence interval: 98–100%). These operating parameters were not substantially altered if the case definition required a procedure code for endoscopy or if cases were limited to those with commercial insurance. However, in 2011, the sensitivity of the code had increased to 61%, while the specificity remained at 99%. The ICD ‐9 code for EoE , 530.13, had excellent specificity for identifying cases of EoE in administrative data, although this high specificity was achieved at an academic center. Additionally, the sensitivity of the code appears to be increasing over time, and the threshold at which it will stabilize is not known. While use of this administrative code will still miss a number of cases, those identified in this manner are highly likely to have the disease.