Open AccessThe Hopelessness Theory of Depression: A Quarter‐Century in Review
Author(s) -
Liu Richard T.,
Kleiman Evan M.,
Nestor Bridget A.,
Cheek Shayna M.
Publication year - 2015
Publication title -
clinical psychology: science and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.285
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1468-2850
pISSN - 0969-5893
DOI - 10.1111/cpsp.12125
Subject(s) - learned helplessness , psychology , depression (economics) , confusion , quarter (canadian coin) , clinical psychology , psychoanalysis , history , archaeology , economics , macroeconomics
Since the formulation of the hopelessness theory of depression ( Psychological Review , 96 , 1989, 358) a quarter‐century ago, it has garnered considerable interest. The current article presents a systematic review of this theory, including its subsequent elaborations (Rose and Abramson's [ Rochester Symposium of Developmental Psychopathology, 1992, University of Rochester Press, Rochester, NY] developmental elaboration; Abela and Sarin's [ Cognitive Therapy and Research , 26 , 2002, 811] weakest link approach; Panzarella, Alloy and Whitehouse's [ Cognitive Therapy and Research , 30 , 2006, 307] expansion of the hopelessness theory; and the hopelessness theory of suicide ( Suicide Science: Expanding Boundaries, 2000, Kluwer Academic, Boston]), followed by recommendations for future study. Although empirical support was consistently found for several major components of the hopelessness theory, further work is required assessing this theory in relation to clinically significant phenomena. Among the most significant hindrances to advancement in this area is the frequent conceptual confusion between the hopelessness theory and the reformulated learned helplessness theory.