z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The Narrowing of Theoretical Orientations in Clinical Psychology Doctoral Training
Author(s) -
Heatherington Laurie,
Messer Stanley B.,
Angus Lynne,
Strauman Timothy J.,
Friedlander Myrna L.,
Kolden Gregory G.
Publication year - 2012
Publication title -
clinical psychology: science and practice
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.285
H-Index - 105
eISSN - 1468-2850
pISSN - 0969-5893
DOI - 10.1111/cpsp.12012
Subject(s) - psychology , graduate students , clinical practice , applied psychology , medical education , counseling psychology , psychotherapist , focus (optics) , professional psychology , clinical psychology , engineering ethics , pedagogy , medicine , nursing , physics , burnout , optics , engineering
The focus of this article is the increasingly narrow range of therapeutic orientations represented in clinical psychology graduate training programs, particularly within the most research‐oriented programs. Data on the self‐reported therapeutic orientations of faculty at “clinical science” P h. D . programs, P h. D . programs at comprehensive universities in clinical and in counseling psychology, P sy. D . programs at comprehensive universities, and P h. D . or P sy. D . programs at freestanding specialized institutions reveal a strong predominance of faculty with cognitive‐behavioral orientations at the more science‐focused programs, and a narrower range of orientations than in the more practice‐focused programs. We discuss the implications of this trend for the future development of clinical psychology and provide suggestions for addressing the attendant concerns.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here
Accelerating Research

Address

John Eccles House
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom