Bridging the Political Deficit: Loss, Morality, and Agency in Films Addressing Climate Change
Author(s) -
Hammond Philip,
Breton Hugh Ortega
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
communication, culture & critique
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.592
H-Index - 10
eISSN - 1753-9137
pISSN - 1753-9129
DOI - 10.1111/cccr.12052
Subject(s) - politics , morality , subjectivity , agency (philosophy) , rhetorical question , political subjectivity , narrative , bridging (networking) , moral agency , sociology , social psychology , aesthetics , environmental ethics , psychology , political science , law , epistemology , social science , philosophy , art , literature , computer network , computer science
This article examines the emotional rhetorical strategies of 3 films—The Day After Tomorrow ([Leiserowitz, A., 2004]), An Inconvenient Truth (2006), and The Age of Stupid (2009)—that attempt to create engagements with the “postpolitical” problem of climate change. In all 3 films the experience of personal loss, the potential for future loss, and the emotions associated with loss are fundamental to affective engagement. The emotional loading of representations of environmental problems derives partly from concerns about human political agency and subjectivity. It is not so much that emotional or moral appeals are simply added on in order to bolster a political message, but rather that autobiographical narratives of loss and morality occupy the space once dominated by modernist forms of politics.
Accelerating Research
Robert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom
Address
John Eccles HouseRobert Robinson Avenue,
Oxford Science Park, Oxford
OX4 4GP, United Kingdom