z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
A taxonomic tool for identifying needle remains of south‐western E uropean P inus species of the Late Quaternary
Author(s) -
García Álvarez Salvia,
Morla Juaristi Carlos,
Paull Rosemary,
GarcíaAmorena Ignacio
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
botanical journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.872
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1095-8339
pISSN - 0024-4074
DOI - 10.1111/boj.12166
Subject(s) - taxon , botany , biology , identification key , taxonomy (biology) , plant taxonomy , range (aeronautics) , woody plant , pinus pinaster , systematics , materials science , composite material
This work provides a tool whereby the needle remains of native, south‐western E uropean P inus spp. can be easily identified from species‐specific epidermal features. To construct this tool, the needles of P . uncinata , P . sylvestris , P . nigra , P . pinaster , P . pinea and P . halepensis were gathered across the N orthern H emisphere range of each taxon and compared with non‐indigenous trees growing in two S outh A ustralian B otanic G ardens. Three needles from each of these species were taken from three adult trees growing at three different localities. Light microscopy was used to observe the key epidermal and stomatal features of the needles. To improve interpretation, additional scanning electron microscopy samples were prepared. Epidermal features, including variation in the diameter of the epistomatal chamber aperture (pore), are described. A taxonomic key based on the size, shape and arrangement of the subsidiary cells of the stomatal complexes was constructed. This key enables the identification of pine needle fragments at the species level (except those belonging to the group P . gr. nigra ‐ uncinata ). Despite their overlapping range, pore size was helpful in distinguishing between P . nigra and P . uncinata and between three groups of species. Isolated stomata were also observed. Cluster and discriminant analyses of stomatal variables described in earlier studies were performed. Overlap in guard cell variables hampers species‐level identification of isolated stomata. Species discrimination is improved if groups of ecological affinity are considered. © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society , 2014, 175 , 282–298.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here