z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
Delayed autonomous self‐pollination in two J apanese varieties of E pipactis helleborine ( O rchidaceae)
Author(s) -
Suetsugu Kenji
Publication year - 2013
Publication title -
botanical journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.872
H-Index - 68
eISSN - 1095-8339
pISSN - 0024-4074
DOI - 10.1111/boj.12111
Subject(s) - biology , pollination , orchidaceae , selfing , outcrossing , ecology , population , botany , self pollination , temperate climate , pollen , demography , sociology
The terrestrial orchid E pipactis helleborine is a morphologically variable species with a wide geographical distribution. It is found throughout E urope and continues eastwards to S iberia, C hina and J apan. It is usually pollinated by social wasps and displays the morphological characteristics of an outcrossing species. In warm, temperate areas of J apan, E . helleborine often appears in alpine or subalpine regions, and has never been found in low‐altitude forests, except for coastal pine forests. The coastal population of E . helleborine is often classified at the variety level, as E . helleborine var. sayekiana , and the inland populations are known as E . helleborine var. papillosa. It is possible that E . helleborine var. sayekiana possesses a distinctive selfing strategy, as its autonomous self‐pollination has evolved in dry habitats, such as coastal dunes. The present study investigated the pollination biology of E . helleborine var. sayekiana and var. papillosa to detect differences in their reproductive systems. Unexpectedly, both E . helleborine var. papillosa and E . helleborine var. sayekiana were found to possess a self‐pollination strategy and were therefore rarely visited by insects. Self‐pollination occurs at the end of the flowering season and probably acts to ensure pollination even if insect‐mediated pollination fails. Moreover, there are no floral differences between E . helleborine var. papillosa and E . helleborine var. sayekiana. These observations suggest that it is not necessary to distinguish between these two varieties. Furthermore, E . helleborine var. papillosa was pollinated by hoverflies, suggesting that E . helleborine var. papillosa is probably biologically distinct from its mother species, E . helleborine . © 2013 The Linnean Society of London, Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society , 2013, 173 , 733–743.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here