Premium
Modeling semi‐competing risks data as a longitudinal bivariate process
Author(s) -
Nevo Daniel,
Blacker Deborah,
Larson Eric B.,
Haneuse Sebastien
Publication year - 2022
Publication title -
biometrics
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 2.298
H-Index - 130
eISSN - 1541-0420
pISSN - 0006-341X
DOI - 10.1111/biom.13480
Subject(s) - bivariate analysis , censoring (clinical trials) , covariate , econometrics , contrast (vision) , inference , ambiguity , truncation (statistics) , computer science , causal inference , statistics , mathematics , artificial intelligence , programming language
As individuals age, death is a competing risk for Alzheimer's disease (AD) but the reverse is not the case. As such, studies of AD can be placed within the semi‐competing risks framework. Central to semi‐competing risks, and in contrast to standard competing risks , is that one can learn about the dependence structure between the two events. To‐date, however, most methods for semi‐competing risks treat dependence as a nuisance and not a potential source of new clinical knowledge. We propose a novel regression‐based framework that views the two time‐to‐event outcomes through the lens of a longitudinal bivariate process on a partition of the time scales of the two events. A key innovation of the framework is that dependence is represented in two distinct forms, local and global dependence, both of which have intuitive clinical interpretations. Estimation and inference are performed via penalized maximum likelihood, and can accommodate right censoring, left truncation, and time‐varying covariates. An important consequence of the partitioning of the time scale is that an ambiguity regarding the specific form of the likelihood contribution may arise; a strategy for sensitivity analyses regarding this issue is described. The framework is then used to investigate the role of gender and having ≥1 apolipoprotein E (APOE) ε4 allele on the joint risk of AD and death using data from the Adult Changes in Thought study.