z-logo
open-access-imgOpen Access
The shell bone histology of fossil and extant marine turtles revisited
Author(s) -
Scheyer Torsten M.,
Danilov Igor G.,
Sukhanov Vladimir B.,
Syromyatnikova Elena V.
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/bij.12265
Subject(s) - biology , pelagic zone , cretaceous , tetrapod (structure) , paleontology , ecology , zoology
Modern turtles exhibit a broad scope of ecological adaptations, including coastal marine and pelagic habitats, and, during their evolutionary history, turtles repeatedly exploited the aquatic environment as well. Although some pleurodiran clades also ventured into the marine realm, it is the cryptodires that did so most extensively. Among those, three major radiation phases are distinguished, with the first phase consisting of basal eucryptodiran taxa inhabiting littoral or near costal environments ( L ate J urassic, E urope); the second phase including more open marine chelonioids (starting in the late E arly C retaceous, mainly N orth A merica and E urasia); and the third phase (starting in the P alaeocene/ E ocene, global distribution) including the highly‐nested chelonioids, such as the modern cheloniid and dermochelyid turtles and closest relatives. A review of previously published as well as unpublished data of shell microstructures of these groups and those of some of the earliest aquatic turtles from the M iddle J urassic, H eckerochelys romani and E ileanchelys waldmani , show that bones are strongly influenced functionally as a result of life spent in an aquatic medium, whereas there are little to no characters of systematic value in the bones. We confirm the general tetrapod pattern that pelagic forms tend to show osteoporotic‐like shell structures and neritic forms tend to have more bone ballast, especially by retaining a thickened external compacta. © 2014 The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2014, 112 , 701–718.

The content you want is available to Zendy users.

Already have an account? Click here to sign in.
Having issues? You can contact us here