
Canalization of body size matters for lifetime reproductive success of male predatory mites ( A cari: P hytoseiidae)
Author(s) -
Walzer Andreas,
Schausberger Peter
Publication year - 2014
Publication title -
biological journal of the linnean society
Language(s) - English
Resource type - Journals
SCImago Journal Rank - 0.906
H-Index - 112
eISSN - 1095-8312
pISSN - 0024-4066
DOI - 10.1111/bij.12235
Subject(s) - phytoseiidae , biology , acari , mating , phenotypic plasticity , zoology , mate choice , predation , longevity , predator , reproductive success , ecology , genetics , demography , population , sociology
The adaptive canalization hypothesis predicts that highly fitness‐relevant traits are canalized via past selection, resulting in low phenotypic plasticity and high robustness to environmental stress. Accordingly, we hypothesized that the level of phenotypic plasticity of male body size of the predatory mites P hytoseiulus persimilis (low plasticity) and N eoseiulus californicus (high plasticity) reflects the effects of body size variation on fitness, especially male lifetime reproductive success ( LRS ). We first generated small and standard‐sized males of P . persimilis and N . californicus by rearing them to adulthood under limited and ample prey supply, respectively. Then, adult small and standard‐sized males were provided with surplus virgin females throughout life to assess their mating and reproductive traits. Small male body size did not affect male longevity or the number of fertilized females but reduced male LRS of P . persimilis but not N . californicus . Proximately, the lower LRS of small than standard‐sized P . persimilis males correlated with shorter mating durations, probably decreasing the amount of transferred sperm. Ultimately, we suggest that male body size is more strongly canalized in P . persimilis than N . californicus because deviation from standard body size has larger detrimental fitness effects in P . persimilis than N . californicus . © 2014 The Authors. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Linnean Society of London, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society , 2014, 111 , 889–899.